6 comments

  • By David Hollingsworth
    November 22, 2011
    05:07 PM

    1) One of the most intense, sobering, masterful, and hard-hitting films of the 1950s. 2) The intensely intimate close-ups of each of the actors could that resemble something out of a Cassavetes film, if he would have made a courtroom film. 3) Henry Fonda's intelligent, and brilliant performance as the 12th juror. Cheat: 4) Sidney Lumet's timeless entrance into film history.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

  • By Steven
    November 22, 2011
    05:48 PM

    1. The intimacy and theatricality of being in one room. 2. The ensemble cast and the way these men interact with each other. 3. The development of where one simple act can lead 11 other different men to really think about the case.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

  • By Kracker
    November 22, 2011
    10:09 PM

    Ugh cop-out set of reasons from Criterion 1. Forever changed the way we look at our judicial system 2. Forever the greatest courtroom drama ever made 3. ..and it doesn't even take place in the courtroom
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

  • By James M. Martin
    January 18, 2012
    06:29 PM

    Of course there is the archetypical basic good guy so often and so nobly played by Hank Fonda, but there is also a supporting cast that invented the word, "ensemble." Each character is delineated with such keen eye to social place and prejudices and biases that come with the territory. But the real star of the movie is the cinematographer, who choreographed the camera movements with the late and very great Sid Lumet in such a way that one never tires for a moment of thinking if one is not watching a stage play. One bad performance and we would be reminded constantly. How Lumet pulled this off is one of the great debut stories in cinema.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

  • By poughkeepsiejohn
    January 21, 2012
    09:19 PM

    1) Sidney Lumet's remarkable directorial debut. 2) As excellent an ensemble cast as you're likely to find. 3) Sometimes, maybe not often, but sometimes, justice can be done.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

  • By Don
    February 25, 2012
    01:45 PM

    I have sat on two juries, and this film was always on my mind, especially on the last one. It was a double shooting where both victims survived and testified. The trial lasted one day, but deliberations lasted three. During the deliberations, it became obvious that the police had faked some of the evidence, in a ham fisted attempt to sway the jury. The jury room was almost as tense as this one, at times. The voting started at 6 to 6, but ended at 11 to 1 for acquittal. The last guy just couldn't set aside his feelings as a victim of an armed robbery. This story has impacted my life since I read the Reginald Rose play in high school, in 1964, and have seen the film more than a dozen times. It does not get better than this.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

Or using your Criterion.com account.

You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.