RELATED ARTICLE
Medicine for Melancholy: Love in a Hopeless Place
The Criterion Collection
Cora’s body is a poem.
When we first meet her, she is standing at a riverbank. Barren trees appear at the edges of the frame like crisp matchsticks. The water glimmers. The scene is encased in a light that is hazy, brittle, cold. At first, Cora’s small, narrow, lonely back is all that we see of her. Then she turns to the camera, which dollies in, closer and closer, as we hear her speak in voice-over: “The first and last thing my mama gave me was apologies.” Her jaw is tight with defiance, her body curved like a question mark waiting for an answer that will never arrive. It is her gaze, though, that has the most striking effect: it is so bold and unwavering that we almost want to look away, for fear of what truths such a look might reveal. Barry Jenkins’s limited series The Underground Railroad (2021) brims with powerful imagery, but its most piercing visions, including this early shot, illuminate the complexity of this woman’s life.
Cora (Thuso Mbedu) is a marked woman—marked by the bondage of slavery, the scars on her back, and the absence of her mother, who made a seemingly successful escape from their plantation before the story begins. Resentful of being left behind, the brooding Cora is deemed a monster by her community of enslaved people, as well as by freedmen and white oppressors. When the series opens, she is about to run away with an enslaved man named Caesar (Aaron Pierre), a journey that will take her from Georgia to the Carolinas and Tennessee, then finally to Indiana. All the while, the slave catcher Arnold Ridgeway (Joel Edgerton), who once hunted her mother to no avail, and Homer (Chase W. Dillon), a Black child whose freedom Ridgeway has purchased in order to mold him as an assistant, nip at her heels.
The Underground Railroad is propulsive and enveloping, and each of its chapters is haunted by the specter of death but contains a kernel of hope. Cora faces many dangers while being pursued by Ridgeway, but it is through her encounters with other Black people she meets along the way—Grace (Mychal-Bella Bowman), a young girl hiding in a white family’s attic; Jasper (Calvin Leon Smith), a gaunt man who starves himself as an act of resistance after being captured by Ridgeway; Royal (William Jackson Harper), a freedman who shows Cora that life can be sweet for Black folks like them—that the series illuminates the true bodily and psychic dynamics of slavery. In these interactions, we come to see Cora as much more than a canvas on which the horrors of this barbaric system are projected. She is an enslaved Black woman granted the full force of humanity, and that makes her an anomaly in this cinematic milieu. She is a woman whose very presence disrupts the common tide of the slavery epic.
Like the book on which it is based—Colson Whitehead’s Pulitzer Prize–winning 2016 novel of the same name—Jenkins’s series is a sly alternate history that hinges on a fabulist idea. Literalizing the figurative name of the secret network of routes that enslaved people traveled to flee bondage, the show envisions a real railroad hidden in subterranean passageways created by Black men, a path on which steam-engine trains transport escapees to freedom. But Jenkins and his collaborators are not dutifully faithful to their source material. Whitehead’s use of magical realism and his slippery sense of time and space are heightened by the addition of cinematic anachronisms further linking the past to the present, such as modern music (Childish Gambino’s “This Is America,” the Pharcyde’s “Runnin’ ”) at the end of most of the series’ ten chapters. Throughout the show, new characters are introduced while ones found in the book are deepened. Events are remixed and complicated in ways that give Cora a different brand of agency than she has on the page. In the show, Cora not only plays a more pivotal role in Ridgeway’s eventual undoing but also forms a deep romantic connection and experiences sexual intimacy, revealing a capacity for vulnerability that the novel’s protagonist, numbed by trauma, does not possess.
Jenkins’s Underground Railroad is filled with hallucinations, dreams, and flashbacks that force Cora to confront the formative wound of the loss of her mother. These formal ruptures render time mercurial, and viewers are guided through this nonlinear structure by the series’ deft pacing and editing, as well as its variations in aspect ratio (the chapters centered on Cora are presented in 1.78:1, while the ones that highlight other characters are presented in 2.39:1). Crucial to the impact of each narrative turn are the contributions of two of Jenkins’s frequent collaborators, who bring us into the characters’ shifting states of mind and make this a rare television show that truly moves like cinema and honors the primacy of the image. Cinematographer James Laxton achieves a grandeur that brings the American South to life as both a physical and a psychic space, but he and Jenkins also create a remarkable intimacy, particularly in their quiet, fourth-wall-breaking shots of characters looking into the camera, their faces filling the screen. Composer Nicholas Britell establishes a mood of romantic melancholy with a tremulous, string-laden score that is interwoven with the show’s richly textured soundscapes of roaring flames and chirping insects.
At first blush, The Underground Railroad is characterized by the kind of actions and motifs one has come to expect from the slavery epic. Cotton is picked. Blood is spilled. The cruelty at the heart of whiteness serves to continually advance the aims of capitalist profit and bigotry. These are familiar tropes in a genre that far too seldom offers any surprises. Slavery films rarely give Black folks space to honestly reflect on America’s second original sin or how its legacy ripples into the present. Instead, these movies tend to soothe the guilt of masochistic white liberals and grant them a feeling of edification, allowing them to avoid reckoning with the racism inside themselves.
Jenkins breaks from this tradition by bringing the corroded nature of whiteness into the light while also maintaining Black subjectivity and tenderness as the show’s guiding principles. One pivotal scene in the first chapter depicts a feast being shared among a group of white people. As they sit around a table and gorge themselves amid an awe-inspiring verdant expanse of Georgia fields, the proximity and low angle of the camera render their faces large and grotesque. They watch expectantly as an enslaved man named Big Anthony (Elijah Everett)—who has just tried to run to freedom, only to be returned to the plantation by Ridgeway—is tied to a wooden frame and brutally whipped until pieces of his flesh drape from his body. The white people’s chatter and the music playing in the background are silenced by the plantation master, Terrance Randall (Ben Walker), who draws the crowd’s attention to Big Anthony’s cruel fate by quoting Bible verses, and orders enslaved people tending the fields to come and witness the depraved spectacle. After the dying man’s body is set aflame, we see the proceedings from his perspective. Blinking eyes open and close, and we see flickering flames and bystanders whose figures are made hazy by the smoke. But the horror of the scene—the most visually gruesome in the series—is not offered with fearful coyness or as torture porn that lavishes more attention on the brutalized body than on the victim’s soul. Rather than inviting us to merely bear witness to physical violence, Jenkins and Laxton allow us to contemplate the interiority of the man enduring this torment.
One element in the scene speaks to the complicated nature of the series as a whole: its beauty. Like much else in The Underground Railroad, this moment elicits awe—through Laxton’s symmetrical compositions, the expressive faces of the enslaved characters, and the lustrous color palette. When the series was released in 2021, it was met with wide acclaim for its operatic sweep, which lends it an air of importance. But while recognizing the gravity of its subject matter, major publications (and their predominantly white critics) often framed the show as a history lesson rather than as the complex sensory experience it is. At the same time, many of my Black colleagues seemed apprehensive about its mixture of horror and visual pleasure. Yet I was reminded of something that Toni Morrison once said about the “absolute necessity” of beauty: “I don’t think it’s a privilege or an indulgence. It’s not even a quest. I think it’s almost like knowledge, which is to say, it’s what we were born for.” Do our ancestors not deserve beauty as much as we do? Did they not suffuse their existence with it in every hard-won way they could? Are their stories important only because of the suffering they contain? Among the many things that distinguish Jenkins’s Underground Railroad is its understanding that Black joy and Black trauma cannot be cleaved from each other.
Initially, Jenkins seemed to some like an odd fit to adapt a book like The Underground Railroad. How would cinema’s foremost evangelist for Black tenderness work within the constraints of the slavery epic? Jenkins succeeds by first obliterating them. The series critiques the narrow imagination of the white gaze, then casts it aside to plunge us into the depths of Black ways of seeing and being. This approach can be traced back to the start of the director’s career. In his first feature, the indie romance Medicine for Melancholy (2008), Jenkins began to explore the nature and physicality of Black tenderness—and how it sprouts, defiant, from the concrete of white supremacy and anti-Blackness around the world. The Oscar-winning Moonlight (2016) took this theme further with its tale of repressed desire and sexuality, as did Jenkins’s next film, a stirring 2018 adaptation of the James Baldwin novel If Beale Street Could Talk.
What Jenkins’s work offers is a reorientation of film narrative around the Black body, a figure that is elsewhere often treated as a troubled metaphor. In his cinematic world, complicated Black women and vulnerable Black men search for joy amid the wreckage of their survival. Extending his career-long preoccupations, The Underground Railroad is suffused with yearning—and with an understanding that “spectacle is not repair,” as the author Christina Sharpe puts it in her book Ordinary Notes. The series also calls to mind the work of another writer, Elizabeth Alexander, who coined the phrase “the black interior.” In one of her essays, she explains:
The black interior is a metaphysical space . . . It is a space that black people ourselves have policed at various historical moments. Tapping into this black imaginary helps us envision what we are not meant to envision: complex black selves, real and enactable black power, rampant and unfetishized black beauty. What do we learn when we pause at sites of contradiction where black creativity complicates and resists what blackness is “supposed” to be?
Cora is not what Blackness is supposed to be in the Hollywood cinematic imagination, and she’s also too prickly to appeal to Black folks who are obsessed with sterling representations of Black excellence—a concept that is ultimately just a panicked answer to a racist supposition. Jenkins enters Cora’s world through his careful study of the Black quotidian, that space in which regular-ass Black folks reach across their community to craft moments of everyday glamour with the means that are available to them. The white gaze could never make room for such a vision, and certainly could never acknowledge its radical potential and communal force. By setting The Underground Railroad in the space of the quotidian, Jenkins reconstitutes and subverts the schema of the slavery epic in cinema, placing the Black body in a realm where beauty and tenderness can be found.
This is an extraordinary achievement, partly because the responsibility of the slavery epic can seem like an impossible weight to bear. How can a work of cinema induce the healing of centuries-old wounds that define our social institutions here in the United States, wounds that the nation’s people and government have long neglected to address? Movies about slavery have fostered such a misleading view of their subject, and so frequently devolve into prurient displays of trauma, that some people believe there should be fewer of them or that we have enough of them already. But these views are misguided. For better or worse, Americans get a lot of their understanding of history from film and television, and these mediums can narrow or widen the aperture for the futures that we imagine for ourselves. This is why it is crucial that the emotional worlds presented in on-screen slavery stories be expansive and rich, just like the lives of the people who endured this violent period of American history.
The discontent surrounding the genre is rooted in the fact that it has historically been caught between two poles. On one end of the spectrum lies a quest for realism (exemplified by the Oscar-winning 2013 film 12 Years a Slave) that focuses so much on physical violence that it tends to sacrifice the interiority of its characters, particularly Black women. On the other end stands the monumental example of Gone with the Wind (1939), which made a myth out of an Old South that never was. By combining the most seductive elements of the Hollywood dream machine with a racist vision that emboldened real-life white supremacists, that blockbuster etched anti-Black stereotypes more deeply into American culture. It is notable that the most potent of its archetypes—the loving but stern mammy (Hattie McDaniel) and the manic pickaninny (Butterfly McQueen)—strip Black women of their womanhood.
Whereas the enslaved characters in Gone with the Wind have a downcast look in their eyes, the gaze of Black folks in The Underground Railroad is penetrating, yearning, and angry as hell, sometimes all at once. When I first reviewed the series upon its release, I found Cora to be a cipher defined solely by her psychic scars. After subsequent viewings, though, I noticed how her embittered, combative demeanor gives way to attempts at tenderness. We see a glimpse of this in the series’ first chapter, after Randall clubs a young Black boy in the face for not being able to recite the Declaration of Independence. Cora throws herself on the child’s crumpled body to protect him from further violence, which only results in both being whipped.
As fragile and fleeting as they are, Cora’s relationships are a continual source of solace in the series. One of the most important bonds she forms is the one she shares with Caesar. After making it to South Carolina with the help of the railroad and the caring people they meet along its route, the pair take on new identities and wear fine clothing that accentuates their beauty. The community they have landed in is run by seemingly forthright, liberal white people who teach Black folks to read, help them with their work, and show them how to present themselves in polite society. But the cracks begin to show as respectability turns deadly. These white liberals are just as dangerous as the masters Cora and Caesar left behind in Georgia, and it is soon revealed that they are slowly poisoning the Black men and sterilizing the Black women they claim to be nurturing. Cora and Caesar are torn from each other’s lives as Ridgeway encircles them, and the trauma of their separation reverberates in later chapters. In one of the series’ most heartbreaking scenes, Cora dreams of walking through the gleaming, amber-lit passageways of the railroad, where she sees Caesar amid a sea of people—the transitory denizens of this underground world. The lovers dance to a lilting string arrangement that echoes a moment from earlier in the series, and Caesar cradles Cora in his arms as she softly cries. In this dream, they have crossed the border of death. What could have been and what will never be are briefly brought into the realm of experience.
While the show criticizes the hollow rhetoric and deadly actions of white liberals, The Underground Railroad also takes aim at their Black counterparts. Late in the series, Cora reaches a farm in Indiana run by John (Peter De Jersey) and Gloria Valentine (Amber Gray), a light-skinned Black couple of genteel comportment. In the chapters that chronicle Cora’s time there, Jenkins explores the tensions that form between Black people of different complexions, and between the more and less educated members of the community. For some on the Valentines’ farm, Cora represents a danger that must be expelled. It is the liberal, upstanding dark-skinned freedman Mingo (Chukwudi Iwuji) who ends up betraying her and bringing a violent fate upon his own people. This devastating turn illustrates the lengths to which whiteness will go to compel Black folks into seeing how it sees and valuing what it values.
Jenkins does not flinch from such thorny realities. But he always returns to the idea of the gaze as a portal to the joys, passions, and contradictions that define Black life. In The Gaze (2021), an experimental project that Jenkins shot on the set of The Underground Railroad, the director gathers meticulous tracking shots that (like several tableaux in the series itself) show characters staring directly into Laxton’s camera. This is portraiture in languid motion. From lead actors like Aaron Pierre to background performers, the cast is incandescent with curiosity and confrontation, as Britell’s score hums and swells and the scenic backdrops evoke the flow of memory. The Gaze distills the ethos of the whole series into fifty-two minutes of wordless splendor.
In Jenkins’s eyes, each scar, gesture, and movement is its own story. He understands that the body keeps its own record. At once a slavery epic that reconstitutes the visual and sonic grammar of its genre and a cinematic masterpiece that functions as both wound and remedy, The Underground Railroad shows how the Black body bears memories and histories that America chooses to forget but, ultimately, can never escape.
In this tragicomic road movie about a Bible-selling con man and his precocious young charge, Peter Bogdanovich brings Depression-era America to vivid life without sentimentality or nostalgia.
Combining sci-fi magic and a distinctly human sense of intimacy, Guillermo del Toro’s Oscar-winning film reimagines an oppressive era in American history through a tale of romantic fate.
William Wyler’s adaptation of the Broadway musical celebrates the indomitability of vaudeville legend Fanny Brice, embodied by Barbra Streisand in an incandescent and remarkably vulnerable performance.
Filled with expressionistic shadows and pungent details of life in the criminal underworld, this seminal tale of money and violence was among director Howard Hawks’s favorite of his own films.