One of the most talked-about movies at this
year’s Sundance, The Last Black Man in San Francisco is both a rhapsodic portrait of first-time director
Joe Talbot’s native city and a mournful look at how gentrification, income
inequality, and systemic racism have affected communities of color there. It
may not be immediately apparent what a film so rooted in contemporary American
society has to do with Ken Russell’s 1969 D. H. Lawrence adaptation Women
in Love, but as Talbot told us during a
recent visit to the Criterion offices, creative inspiration can come from
unexpected places. In this article, edited together from our conversation, he
shares what he learned from Russell’s extravagant style and approach to the
subject of male relationships.
I saw Women in Love just before making The Last Black Man in San Francisco, and it left a lasting impression on me. Ken Russell has been described as someone who pushes up against the boundaries of excess, and I think that’s part of what makes him so exciting, especially today, when independent filmmaking has gotten so economical and young filmmakers are usually taught to do the bare minimum to tell their stories. Russell flies in the face of that; he wants to bathe in every little detail and use the medium to its fullest potential to create an all-engrossing experience.
Though our film is, of course, quite different from Women in Love, I was struck by some unexpected thematic parallels when I watched it. When people talk to us about our movie, they often point to the lead characters, Jimmie and Mont, and what a relief it is to see two men be so vulnerable with each other. Even though the relationship between Alan Bates and Oliver Reed’s characters is more erotic than Jimmie and Mont’s, I think both stories push against societal taboos that make it hard for men to be intimate and emotional with each other, whether romantically or platonically.
Women in Love also seems to condemn England and its hypocrisies, while also presenting it as an enchanting on-screen world overflowing with spirited characters, fabulously anachronistic costumes, breathtaking locales, and joyfully choreographed dance sequences. It’s critical of a time and place that it also depicts as alluring. Alan Bates plays a thinly veiled stand-in for D. H. Lawrence, spouting proto-hippie philosophy about free love—which gives you some idea of why the book was so perfect to revisit in the sixties. Oliver Reed’s character receives the same complex treatment that England does—he’s both a tightly wound capitalist who’s cringe-inducingly cruel to his workforce and a deeply tormented soul (hinted at by his scarred face). That sort of juxtaposition spoke to me and the people I worked with on Last Black Man, as we tried to express our ambivalence about San Francisco. I think you find in both Last Black Man and Women in Love a sense of what it’s like to love a place while also having a lot of problems about what’s happening in it.
One especially memorable sequence in Women in Love comes when our titular leads—sisters played by Glenda Jackson and Jennie Linden—attend a party at a sprawling estate owned by Reed and frequented by his best friend (and perhaps more) Bates. This extended section in the film holds much of what makes Ken Russell so intoxicating. As a director watching it, I think about what it might have looked like in the script and the various possibilities there would have been to present what was on the page. Some filmmakers would have chosen to use only what was necessary to do so, perhaps staging an intimate gathering where we follow our foursome in handheld close-ups, focusing mostly on dialogue and plot. But this is Ken Russell—and his execution lavishly uses all the tools available to engage all of our senses.
The sequence begins with a series of shots away from our leads, establishing this swinging afternoon party. A long zoom reveals rows of men downing beers at a unending table. A ghostly woman watches the party from her palatial window. There’s a merry-go-round and people dancing on a lawn in pinstripe coats and bowler hats. There are parasols and lovers on paddle boats. One especially lovestruck pair of skinny dippers that Russell draws our attention to leap into the lake, giggling. Soon, they will drown.
And all of this is just the background! In the foreground, we have our quartet, flirting and fighting and speaking in double entendres. This tension gets pushed to new heights in the middle section of this sequence. Glenda Jackson and Jennie Linden have ventured off into a nearby field, away from the bustle of the party. The scene starts off with Jackson dancing to her sister’s singing. As she prances further away, the sweet song turns haunting and becomes increasingly disembodied; Russell adds a soft reverberation to the vocal that recalls the Mitchum-Gish duet from The Night of the Hunter.
Then, Jackson’s frolicking dance brings her nearly head-on with a herd of cattle. We go from painterly static shots of her twirling through the frame to handheld camerawork, as she inexplicably starts to taunt and tease the wild animals. (There are some frames where Jackson and the cattle share the shot, ramping up the intensity with what feels like a very real threat of danger.) Russell, who turns on a dime with Olympic precision, shifts the tension toward humor when Alan Bates arrives, less concerned than bemused, and breaks into a brief musical number. Reed, who is falling in love with Jackson, runs after her as she chases his cattle away like a madwoman. Seemingly as aroused as he is startled, he grabs her, and the tone shifts again. Things get sexy-strange between them through a series of cross-fades that feel like swells of lust. The fades also show us just how much fun Russell is having with the medium.
Reed is at Jackson’s mercy. He’s a tough industrialist, but he can’t figure her out, he can’t possess her. He’s both lusting after Jackson and afraid of her, and she’s literally dancing circles around him. If you didn’t know the context of the characters, you’d almost think Jackson was dancing circles around Reed the actor. She commands him and us, her wonderful, large mouth threatening to devour him whole.
This scene is set to Georges Delerue’s unusual score, which doesn’t feel rooted either in the 1960s, when the film was made, or in the post–World War I era, when the story is set. And because it doesn’t feel tied to any particular place in time, the music seems more interested in playing off of the characters emotions and anxieties than in chasing historical accuracy. That may be more common now, but it feels pretty hip for this period. We scored Last Black Man with our own less typical, lush orchestral music. I’m sure Russell’s bravery in doing that same thing inspired my own.
Russell’s twists back and forth between tones and emotions are so swift—as you can see in the video below—that I sat on the edge of my seat most of the film, totally enraptured, but without any idea where he was taking me. It felt like every other minute I was involuntarily interrupting the film, shout-whispering “Oh my god” and turning to my fellow moviegoers, Camille and Nat, awestruck. Would this all end in tragedy? Or in some humorous punchline? (Of course, Russell being Russell, he does both.) For all of its near-excess, that constant dance between humor and pain, lust and violence, and so on, gives Women in Love an exciting liveliness. It may not feel like real life, but it’s more interesting than wallowing in one droning tone or using only two colors to paint.
Love’s Labors: The Killing Floor Illuminates the Dream of an Interracial Workers’ Movement
Bill Duke’s feature debut is a rarity in American cinema: a labor film, funded by unions and public money, that balances political urgency with emotional tenderness.
Jean-Claude Carrière, Harvester of Cinema
A close friend and collaborator of Carrière’s reflects on the late writer’s fearless approach to the creative process and the source of his staggering productivity.
A Tendency Toward Dirty Laundry: Camille Billops and James Hatch’s Unflinchingly Personal Cinema
Rooted in their trailblazing work as archivists of Black culture, the duo’s transgressively candid documentaries combine revelations of family life with cultural analysis.
You have no items in your shopping cart