You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By John Bailey June 20, 2012 03:41 PM
Even for a dedicated "film" person like me, I am constantly amazed at the ever improving digital technology being used in restoring classic films. The recent Jean Vigo "L'Atalante" is miraculous. Chaplin's classic films are way overdue for the sensitive and dedicated work that is the hallmark of Criterion.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Hunter Hale June 20, 2012 03:47 PM
To be able to see one of the truly classic silent films in such a beautiful presentation (with Chaplin's music) hast to rank as one of your most important offerings. I have owned prints of THE GOLD RUSH on Super 8mm, 16mm, Laser Disc, Video and more then one version on DVD, but the Criterion release on Blu-ray is a brand new experience. Thanks to Kevin Brownlow and all at Criterion is were willing to put the time and money into this project.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By ALH June 20, 2012 04:17 PM
Reformatting the footage from the prints with optical soundtrack just removes more information, further compromising the frame and Chaplin's original intent. I don't agree with that decision AT ALL.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By AnalogJeff June 20, 2012 04:46 PM
I had that same reaction -- that we're losing some of the information, some of the composition for the sake of "proper" aspect ratio.
By theiny June 21, 2012 06:28 AM
I strongly agree - I would have expected a more sensible approach by Criterion... As seen in the recent restauration of Metropolis, it IS possible to combine different aspect ratios without confusing the viewer too much. The decision here is clearly and sadly a huge nod to the mainstream market, and a wasted opportunity to 'teach' the regular viewer a more historical accurate watching of the film.
By Jim June 23, 2012 04:59 PM
Actually, this is the accurate way to present the film. The optical sound track and the film edges are always matted out by the projector to a particular aspect ratio. In this era, it was usually 1.37:1. Even current films have soundtrack information outside the frame and between the sprocket holes, but you don't see it. #rtfm
By Come on guys! June 20, 2012 04:24 PM
Awesome job, and here's a vote for similar Criterion magic with the Marx Brothers, talk about a subject long over due!
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Marty June 20, 2012 05:03 PM
Very excited to see the blu ray version of Gold Rush. Love that short video showing the restoration. Congratulations and thanks for all that hard work.
Now get to work on "City Lights"! Oh yeah...those old Marx Brother's films could use a clean-up as well.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Ryan Boyd June 22, 2012 12:17 AM
I second this motion.
By Monty Britton June 20, 2012 06:25 PM
Criterion has ALWAYS done phenominal work on film restorations since I discovered them in my Laserdisc years. Boy, how technologies have changed! Never thought I would see Criterion doing hi def. They do such good work that I must purchase the blu rays when available. They are worth the upgrade! I look forward to every title Criterion puts out because I KNOW that they know what they are doing (unlike most of these money hungry studios) when it comes to their releases. It is a shame they lost the rights for The Grand Illusion on blu ray. They did such a great job on the DVD from years ago. Studios need to let Criterion put out more of their releases because they do it right! Thanks Criterion, you are the best!!
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Bill Dakota June 20, 2012 06:48 PM
Now try to restore the black & white scenes in the THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT movies. A collection of Hollywood's MGM features and only half restored. A shame.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Leonardo Mustachio June 20, 2012 07:59 PM
Great work, Criterion. Incredible film restorations. By the way, don't you think that both The Go-Between and Isadora belong on the Criterion list? Neither film is on Dvd.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Carl June 21, 2012 02:06 PM
I say let ALH, AnalogJeff and theiny watch the old, faded, scratched and dirty versions in the proper aspect ratios. I'm always amazed that when folks like Criterion do noble work for the preservation of film there's always a few nitpickers who want to crap on it.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Shaun June 22, 2012 06:38 PM
Criterion silence free thought...including mine...people have a right to go against the status quo and offer differing opinions. Criterion: shame for censoring my respectful comments; you have a history of altering product for markets and not art...usually you're great. This my be for the censor's eye only...here goes n'thing
Shaun, your earlier comment has been freed from the automated spam filter. It was not intentionally held from being posted; we never saw it. Sorry about that.
By Shaun June 21, 2012 03:32 PM
I disagree Carl. Although I too love Criterion, telling these intelligent users (making good points) to be quiet and do what they're told is anathema to many cineastes; we're a freethinking and intelligent bunch.
Although it's great to have The Gold Rush (and all the other great Criterion titles) it's simply silly to ignore the fact that Criterion does alter their titles for business reasons that are not entirely faithful to the film itself. Take their "window boxing" practice as another example.
I do not know enough about this issue to say who's correct, but I do not trust ANY sentiment that essentially says "don't question the status quo". A little respectful difference of opinion is healthy especially when it's about film scholarship and preservation.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Shaun June 26, 2012 12:46 AM
Anna, thank you for bothering to say anything. I apologize too - I should have followed my mother's advice and counted to 10 first.
Just bought this release today - wonderful film. I think both look fine. The '25 version is my favorite - Chaplin's voiceover is a bit much for me. It seems as if Criterion agrees? The commentary accompanies the "supplemental" 1925 film, not the "Chaplin approved" 1942 version. :)
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By zefwagner November 19, 2012 02:10 AM
Much like the way the original versions of the Star Wars movies are superior to the "director approved" Special Editions, the 1925 Gold Rush is superior to Chaplin's wrong-headed attempt to update it for modern audiences. It's nice to have both, but the 1925 version should be considered the definitive edition.
“cant wait to grab this, great release. watching the 3 reasons reminded me of another wonderful prison film, Kiss of the Spider Woman, which altho available in a nice edition already, would make a . . .”
“Having just revisited this peculiar but stupendously worthy film, I have to express a contrary opinion to the effect that I found Steiger's magnificently fleshed-out and characterized villain to . . .”
29 comments
By Criterionfriend
June 20, 2012
03:20 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Benjamin Ricci
June 20, 2012
03:27 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Bobby
June 20, 2012
03:33 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By John Bailey
June 20, 2012
03:41 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Hunter Hale
June 20, 2012
03:47 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By ALH
June 20, 2012
04:17 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By AnalogJeff
June 20, 2012
04:46 PM
By theiny
June 21, 2012
06:28 AM
By Jim
June 23, 2012
04:59 PM
By Come on guys!
June 20, 2012
04:24 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By RV Gomez
August 19, 2012
06:50 PM
By Znanna Liberzon
June 20, 2012
04:45 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Marty
June 20, 2012
05:03 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Rickey Freeman
June 20, 2012
05:03 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Michael Golding
June 20, 2012
05:50 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Ryan Boyd
June 22, 2012
12:17 AM
By Monty Britton
June 20, 2012
06:25 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Bill Dakota
June 20, 2012
06:48 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Leonardo Mustachio
June 20, 2012
07:59 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Chad G.
June 21, 2012
12:30 AM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Carl
June 21, 2012
02:06 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Shaun
June 22, 2012
06:38 PM
By Anna T.
June 25, 2012
03:07 PM
By Shaun
June 21, 2012
03:32 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By C Chan
June 22, 2012
05:22 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Soledad Robledo
June 25, 2012
09:35 PM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By Shaun
June 26, 2012
12:46 AM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.
By zefwagner
November 19, 2012
02:10 AM
Or log in and post using your Criterion.com account.
You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.