• A Night to Remember

    By Michael Sragow

    In Ray Johnson’s documentary The Making ofA Night to Remember”, Walter Lord says that when he wrote his 1955 book on the 1912 sinking of the Titanic, there was no mass interest in the topic; nothing had been written about it in the previous four decades. The statement demonstrates Lord’s focus: the event’s reality rather than its mythology. For in 1953, Twentieth Century-Fox presented a smash hit melodrama called Titanic, produced and co-written by Billy Wilder’s longtime partner, Charles Brackett, who, astonishingly, won an Oscar for the soap-operatic script. A forerunner of ’70s disaster films, Titanic hooked the audience with fictional star turns for Clifton Webb, Barbara Stanwyck, and Richard Basehart; the catastrophe served to test their bogus characters.

    Although in his acknowledgments Lord thanked a Fox employee for being “a gold mine of useful leads,” Lord’s meticulous page-turner reverses Hollywood’s priorities. Drawing on historical materials and survivors’ first-hand accounts, it provides a minute-by-minute record of what actually happened—the mundaneness and absurdity as well as the heartbreak. In this high point of you-are-there realism, kaleidoscopic anecdotes flesh out and clarify the ship’s downfall and the hierarchical treatment of its first-, second-, and third-class passengers.

    The impulse to get things right also motivates the superb 1958 British movie adaptation, produced by William MacQuitty, directed by Roy Baker, and written by Eric Ambler. As a boy of six, MacQuitty watched the Titanic’s launch from a Belfast shipyard. But the experience all three men shared—morale-boosting documentary and feature production in World War II—accounts for this film’s stirring vividness. In its directness of attack and its use of composite characters, A Night to Remember brought the best of Britain’s fact-based war culture into the late ’50s. The moviemakers give their period piece the immediacy of a docudrama and in so doing pierce through popular misconceptions. The Titanic is fixed in the common vocabulary as a symbol of slipshod design: Politicians accuse complacent foes of “dancing on the Titanic,” cut-rate travel services contend, “We’re not the Queen Mary, but we’re not the Titanic, either.” By positioning the steamer as the film’s true star, MacQuitty and company remind us that it was—if not “unsinkable”—a paragon of power and luxury. Human error and natural calamity led to its fatal scrape with an iceberg. A Night to Remember has a plainspoken complexity. It emphasizes that laxness, snobbery, and hubris coexisted with discipline and courage on a night when 705 were saved and roughly 1500 lost. The film allows you to be infuriated by any number of screw-ups and oversights, including the neglect of steerage passengers, yet still be awestruck by the crisp judgment of the ship’s captain (Laurence Naismith), second officer (Kenneth More), and builder (Michael Goodliffe). In the midst of mayhem, Mrs. Isidor Straus spurns a seat in a lifeboat so she can spend the remainder of her life with her husband, and a gentleman tells his wife and three children to go on and not worry, because he’ll follow soon (he knows he won’t; there aren’t enough boats). This film, like Lord’s history, captures the final gasp of high-society chivalry.

    Lord writes in his book: “What troubled people especially was not just the tragedy—or even its needlessness—but the element of fate in it all. If the Titanic had heeded any of the six ice messages on Sunday . . . if ice conditions had been normal . . . if the night had been rough or moonlit . . . if she had seen the berg fifteen seconds sooner—or fifteen seconds later . . . if she had hit the ice any other way . . . if her watertight bulkheads had been one deck higher . . . if she had carried enough boats . . . if the Californian [just 10 miles away] had only come. Had any one of these ‘ifs’ turned out right, every life might have been saved. But they all went against her—a classic Greek tragedy.”

    Eric Ambler, the screenwriter, is famous for pioneering the thriller form in modern classics like his novel A Coffin for Dimitrios, not for updating Greek tragedy. Yet in Dimitrios’ opening lines, Ambler admits that chance can “operate with a sort of fumbling coherence readily mistakable for the workings of a self-conscious Providence.” In his scripts for military movies like The Cruel Sea, he depicts the waste and the human salvage of men in desperate straits. A Night to Remember is an Ambler thriller turned inside out. Although you know the ship will sink, Ambler marshals his information so skillfully that he catches you up in the strands of a fatal parabola. And although you keep waiting for the doomed to enter a “state of abandon” (a state Ambler charts in his books, in the phrase of his great fan Graham Greene), most of the Titanic’s victims face death with dignity and courage.

    Director Baker, cinematographer Geoffrey Unsworth, and art director Alex Vetchinsky achieve maximum tension and clarity; Bill Wallington’s ingenious special effects never overwhelm the drama. The moviemakers increasingly employ Carol Reed-like tilted shots. But in Reed’s films, the director tilts the camera, to express moral and psychological uncertainty. Baker keeps the camera level: The sets tilt as the ship goes under. When a rocking-horse sways menacingly in closeup, the floor seems to drop from under your feet; the world loses its bearings. As the documentary notes, the hydraulic jacks that shifted the sets emitted a groan identical to the sound of the teetering ship—the eeriest example of the way craft imitated life and created art. You believe the stalwart second officer when he says he’ll never be sure again—of anything.

    Michael Sragow reviews new movies for SF Weekly and old ones for the New Yorker.

4 comments

  • By Mark Martinez
    January 19, 2012
    08:11 PM

    I am really excited that Criterion is releasing a restored version of "A Night To Remember", the best film ever on the Titanic. The timing couldn't have been better since this year marks the 100th Anniversary of the tragedy.
    Reply
  • By Paul_Aldretti
    March 05, 2012
    05:59 PM

    I love this film. Not only is the cinematography wonderful (which cries out for a definitive edition by Criterion), the performances are all outstanding. I find it interesting comparing this to James Cameron's melodrama -- the scenes he copies virtually intact and those in which he goes for hyperbole instead of letting the drama manifest itself in the characters and context. Another example of how restraint can evoke stronger emotions than manipulation.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

    • By Manuel
      April 12, 2012
      09:20 PM

      I also noticed how James Cameron makes a lot of use of scenes and lines from this film. I don't think I've ever seen interviews of him in which he gives credit to this film (or Lord's book) as a major influence on his film. Whether or not he has directly acknowledged its influence, it is very clear that he owes a lot to "A Night to Remember."
  • By paully
    April 17, 2014
    07:15 PM

    I've never watched the James Cameron version, only bits and fragments. That's because "A Night To Remember" is aces in accuracy.
    Reply

Or using your Criterion.com account.

You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.