• Moderntimes_large

    After five great years, we’re bidding farewell to Hulu. We hope you’ll join us over at FilmStruck, the new streaming service we’ve just launched with our friends at Turner Classic Movies. The Criterion Channel, our home base on the platform, is your place to explore the breadth of our collection with a wide range of regularly updated curated programs, introductions, original content, and much more.

    Take a look at what we’ve got lined up for programming so far, and leave us a comment if you have ideas about what you’d like to see down the road!


  • By David K.
    March 04, 2017
    04:51 PM

    I'll be getting FilmStruck as soon as it's available on my Roku. Thank you Criterion for your excellent disks and movie selection, and giving people an alternate way to view them!
  • By Jeff C.
    March 15, 2017
    05:16 PM

    I will subscribe to FilmStruck only when it works on my Roku. I very much look forward to it; the FilmStruck site states that this will happen in Spring 2017...I hope it does (only 16 days remaining).
  • By AML
    March 16, 2017
    12:13 AM

    I signed up just to leave this comment. I've been a fan and customer for many years, so I was very disheartened to see you make such a poor decision. I can only hope eventually you'll come to your senses and move back to a major streaming service.
  • By japanesefilm
    March 19, 2017
    05:08 PM

    Moving to FilmStruck was a terrible decision. So many classic Criterion films are not available there, such as Godzilla. What percentage are not available anymore??
  • By Cole Duffy
    March 20, 2017
    04:23 PM

    It'd be great if a link for each film available on Filmstruck was added to their pages like how it was when everything was on Hulu.
  • By Emir K
    April 20, 2017
    06:38 PM

    I think leaving Hulu will be long-term a disservice to both the Criterion collection financially and (relatedly) the cause of increasing the set of people watching Criterion films. The move to Film Struck is essentially a move towards sticking with a small sliver of hard-core Criterion fans and giving up on everyone else including multiple person households -- e.g. in many households Hulu makes sense b/c members have vastly varying tastes and Criterion offers one alternative to members who care for it. On the other hand, unless your entire household is completely into Criterion, it is hard to justify $7 a month just for FilmStruck. In the short run this is likely more than what Hulu paid Criterion but in the long run I don't see it as sustainable. I will go out on a limb here and predict that unless you go the institutional route (e.g. get universities etc. to sign up en masse) things will get hard financially. Unless of course, this entire thing serves as a negotiating tactic to extract a better deal from Hulu
  • By Virgil
    May 12, 2017
    02:17 AM

    What an awful decision. You've forced everyone to now adopt ANOTHER streaming service. Most of us have Hulu, Amazon Prime and Netflix or some combo w/Hulu having Criterion. Again an awful decision and a major reason why many use torrents to download films rather than pay for an unmanageable number of services. You reap what you sow, goodbye and hello Pirate Bay.
  • By terribly
    May 25, 2017
    10:43 AM

    Another disappointed Canadian due to the national restriction. This really is dumb in an era of cross-border data. Sort of like region codes for DVDs. It is just 20th century BS. And I have to agree with many of the commentators. I would have stuck with a major player like Hulu or Netflix. I also am disinclined to go to another streaming service. Better yet, why be exclusive and get your product onto multiple platforms. Not really a good move.
  • By Michael
    May 28, 2017
    03:39 AM

    I agree with many others, I loved having th criterion a part of hulu but there is no way on top of Netflix, Hulu and Amazon that I am going to pay another 10.99 a month for just a niche genre. It was great to have as an option with other varieties but not to stand alone and when I am already paying for cable as well, maybe if you allowed your films to be accessed with a cable subscription through TCM on demand... sorry to see you go
  • By Septimodelinea
    June 08, 2017
    12:21 AM

    I love Criterion, but eleven dollars a month on top of Hulu is a bit too much for me. I will have to pass on this one. :(
  • By Mhm
    June 26, 2017
    10:52 PM

    I have to say my heart warmed at hearing about Criterion streamed. After reading the legion of complaints about Filmstruck app and streaming service, I'm most disappointed. I'd gladly pay the $11/mo. but not for no service. A product of Criterion's stature deserves better. I hope it puts pressure on Filmstruck to fix this mess. I'd sign up then.
  • By SKSmith
    July 13, 2017
    09:50 PM

    I am deeply saddened to discover that Criterion has left Hulu and that it is not available with a another comparably popular service such as Amazon or Netflix (I too made an account just to make this known). As a university graduate student it was a delight to be able to watch so many renowned films through Criterion's partnership with Hulu. However, as many others have lamented, it is untenable to maintain so many different accounts. I already have accounts with Hulu, Amazon, and Netflix, so on a tight budget it will not be possible for me to subscribe to yet another service (and in fact I am now contemplating ending my subscription with Hulu. Honestly, Criterion films being available was my main reason for even subscribing in the first place.). I often watched the long list of Japanese films by greats such as Mizoguchi, Kurosawa, and others. It is almost impossible to find legitimate sources to watch anything Japanese that is of any real substance (i.e. is not anime). Unfortunately, I think this move will keep younger generations from developing interest in classic films. Due to Criterion being available on Hulu, many of my undergraduate classmates started to watch Japanese movies that were not anime. I was surprised that many even knew directors other than Kurosawa and that some even bought DVDs to add to their collections. I am extremely disheartened at the thought of them now never getting exposure to truly great Japanese films and going back to only watching anime. I also second what other users have stated in that this move keeps Criterion from gaining a wider audience that will sustain its future growth. This is a terrible, terrible loss. I hope for Criterion's sake this move is successful, but deep down I will keep wishing for it's partnership with Netflix, Amazon, or Hulu in the near future. :"(
  • By Charles-Patrick Hill
    August 10, 2017
    05:58 PM

    I really wish you would have went with a service that people can actually use off a computer, on a tv for example. Filmstruck doesn't allow a verity of popular devices like stick options and gaming devices like X-Box or PlayStation. Amazon, Netflix, or Hulu are the most accessible streaming platforms.Choosing someone else really limits peoples access to these great films. Having your own streaming service does the same thing because you will not have the access to the resources the other streaming services to make your service accessible across platforms. Another $10.99 subscription for your service on top of what people are investing in streaming services is a kick in the rear to regular people. I understand you want to make money, but I am very, very Upset!
  • By J B.
    October 27, 2017
    02:09 PM

    I am seriously dismayed by the decision to leave Hulu. I truly enjoyed the Criterion Collection and have recently returned to Hulu only to discover it's departure. I do not wish to spend on yet another service. Hope to see your return to a more viewed and popular formate!
  • By Fourchette
    November 13, 2017
    09:28 AM

    I'm planning to subscribe to FilmStruck solely on the basis of its partnership with Criterion but I'm not happy because I was planning on subscribing to Hulu for the same reason (well . . . among others as well). I can afford to do both but that doesn't mean I like having to do so. And as for TCM titles, my cable package includes TCM. This just seems like a silly move on Criterion's part but I'm guessing none of us know the reasons behind it--maybe they're compelling?
  • By multiverse
    December 22, 2017
    04:58 PM

    Canada can't wait to have access to FilmStruck!
  • By Javier
    December 24, 2017
    10:59 PM

    Peru needs this pleasee!!! This is the best thing that you've made, but please make it available for Peru!!!
  • By Christiana Haikali
    January 07, 2018
    01:44 PM

    Please make this available for Europe!! :)
  • By Diana
    February 01, 2018
    02:14 AM

    I would love to know why not all of the criterion is on Film Struck I've been looking forward to watching Don't Look Now, and it seems to not be on the site. I'm also curious when this will be available for Ps4 use as its not always the best format to watch a film on a laptop...
  • By David P.
    February 03, 2018
    09:44 PM

    I love Janus Films and I love the Criterion Collection. I own quite a number of the DVDs. But after two weeks of trial membership on FilmStruck, I've decided to cancel. // Issues: the search functionality is very poor; the closed-caption subtitles have a lot of errors (dropped characters and sometimes whole words and phrases); and tonight we watched a subtitled movie (not closed-captioned) that frequently got sound and image out of sync, requiring me to restart Flash. Controlling the film on Flash is much more awkward than with most other video play-back tools I've used. // It's a great idea, but the implementation has fallen short. I hope the bugs get worked out, and after that, I'd love to try it again. I'm an engineer, and I really sympathize about the difficulties. but the implementation to be correct and it just isn't there yet.