Film_209w_throughglass_original

Andrei Tarkovsky Talks Film

by Grant Douglas Bromley

Created 03/15/13

Edit List

These Criterion titles are listed in no particular order, but are listed because they were mentioned by Andrei Tarkovsky in his book "Sculpting In Time". Most of his favorites films were created by the contemporaries that he respected, or the filmmakers that he learned from while in film school. In addition to these films, he frequently praised the bodies of work by Luis Buñuel, Charlie Chaplin, Kenji Mizoguchi, Jean Vigo, and Federico Fellini.

  • "Bergman is a master with sound. It's impossible to forget what he does with the lighthouse in THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY: a sound on the very brink of audibility... War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY to explore his view of man."

  • "For instance, when Bergman uses sound naturalistically - hollow footsteps in an empty corridor, the chime of a clock, the rustle of a dress - the effect is in fact to enlarge the sounds, single them out, hyperbolise them... He singles out one sound and excludes all the incidental circumstances of the sound-world that would exist in real life. In WINTER LIGHT he has the noise of the water in the stream where the suicide's body has been found on the bank. Throughout the entire sequence, all in long and medium shots, nothing can be heard but the uninterrupted sound of the water - no footsteps, no rustle of clothes, none of the words exchanged by the people on the bank. That is the way sound is made expressive in this sequence, that is how he uses it."

  • "In Bergman's CRIES AND WHISPERS there is one particularly powerful episode, perhaps the most important one in the film. Two sisters arrive in their father's house where their elder sister lies dying. The film develops out of the expectation of her death. Here, finding themselves alone together, they are suddenly and unexpectedly drawn together by their sisterly tie and by the longing for human contact; they talk and talk and talk... they cannot say all they want to... they caress each other... The scene creates a searing impression of human closeness... Fragile and longed for... And all the more so since in Bergman's film such moments are elusive and fleeting."

  • "In Kurosawa's version of Macbeth we find a perfect example. In the scene where Macbeth is lost in the forest, a lesser director would have the actors stumbling around in the fog in search of the right direction, bumping into trees. And what does the genius Kurosawa do? He finds a place with a distinctive, memorable tree. The horsemen go around in a circle, three times, so that the sight of the tree eventually makes it clear that they keep going past the same spot. The horsemen themselves don't realise that they long ago lost their way. In his treatment of the concept of space Kurosawa here displays the most subtle poetic approach, expressing himself without the slightest hint of mannerism or pretentiousness. For what could be simpler than setting the camera and following the characters around three times?"

  • "There is one film that could not be further removed from the principle of direct observation, and that is Eisenstein's IVAN THE TERRIBLE. Not only is the whole film a kind of hieroglyphic, it consists of a series of hieroglyphics—major, minor and minute. There is not a single detail that is not permeated with the author's intent."

  • "What can one say, for instance, about the way Antonioni works with his actors in L'AVVENTURA? Or Orson Welles in CITIZEN KANE? All we are aware of is the unique conviction of the character. But this is a qualitatively different, screen conviction, the principles of which are not those that make acting expressive in a theatrical sense."

  • "In theatre actual blood cannot be convincing as a demonstration of poetic truth if it merely has meaning on one level, as a natural function. Blood in cinema, on the other hand, is blood, not a sign, not a symbol of anything else. Therefore when the hero of Wajda's ASHES AND DIAMONDS is killed surrounded by sheets hanging out to dry, and he presses one of these to his chest as he falls, and his scarlet blood spreads across the white linen to make a red and white symbol of the Polish flag, the resulting image is more literary than cinematic, even though it is extraordinarily powerful emotionally."

  • "I still remember the first film I managed to see at the Institute on the eve of the entry exams THE LOWER DEPTHS by Renoir, based on Gorky's play. I was left with a strange, puzzling impression, a feeling of something forbidden, clandestine, unnatural."

  • "Bresson's actors on the other hand will never seem dated, any more than his films will. There is nothing calculated or special in their performances, only the profound truth of human awareness within the situation defined by the director. They do not play personae but live their own inner lives in front of our eyes. Not for one moment does Mouchette reflect on her audience, or think of trying to convey the full 'depths' of what is happening to her. She never 'shows' the audience what a bad way she is in. She seems not even to suspect that her inner life may be observed, witnessed. She lives, exists, within her constricted, concentrated world, plumbing its depth. That is the secret of her magnetism, and I have no doubt that decades hence the film will be as overwhelming as it was on the day of its first showing."

  • "Dreyer's silent [THE PASSION OF] JOAN OF ARC has never ceased to affect us just as strongly [as the performance in Bresson's MOUCHETTE]."

  • "In world cinema there have been many attempts to create a new concept in film, always with the general aim of bringing it closer to life, to factual truth. Hence pictures like Cassavetes' SHADOWS, Shirley Clarke's THE CONNECTION, Jean Rouch's CHRONICLE OF A SUMMER. These notable films are marked, apart from anything else, by a lack of commitment; complete and unconditional factual truth is not consistently pursued."

  • "Of course people don't learn from experience; today's directors constantly use styles of performance that belong patently to the past. Even Larisa Shepitko's THE ASCENT is marred for me by her determination to be expressive and significant: the result is that her 'parable' has meaning only on one level. As so often happens, her effort to 'stir' the audience makes for an exaggerated emphasis on her characters' emotions. It is as if she were afraid of not being understood, and had made her characters walk on invisible buskins. Even the lighting is calculated to instill the performances with meaning. Unfortunately the effect is stilted and false. In order to oblige the audience to sympathize with the characters, the actors have been made to demonstrate their suffering. Everything is more painful, more tortured, than in real life - even the torment and the pain; and above all, more portentous."

  • "The completion of IVAN'S CHILDHOOD marked the end of one cycle of my life, and of a process that I saw as a kind of self-determination. It was made up of study at the Institute of Cinematography, work
    on a short film for my diploma, and then eight months' work on my first feature film. I could now assess the experience of IVAN'S CHILDHOOD, accept the need to work out clearly, albeit temporarily, my own position in the aesthetics of cinema, and set myself problems which might be solved in the course of making my next film: in all of this I saw a pledge of my advance onto new ground. The work could all have been done in my head."

  • "Underlying the concept of Andrei Rublev's character is the schema of a return to the beginning; I hope this emerges in the film as the natural and organic progression of the 'free' flow of life created on the screen. For us the story of Rublev is really the story of a 'taught', or imposed concept, which burns up in the atmosphere of living reality to arise again from the ashes as a fresh and newly- discovered truth."

  • "Unfortunately I never developed a working relationship with Donatas Banionis, who had the main part in SOLARIS, because he belongs to the category of analytical actors who cannot work without knowing the why and the wherefore. He cannot play anything spontaneously from within himself. He has first to build up his role; he has to know the relationship between the sequences, and what the other actors are doing, not only in his own scenes but in the whole film; he tries to take over from the director. This is almost certainly the result of all the years he spent in the theatre. He cannot accept that in cinema the actor must not have a picture of how the finished film is going to look. But even the best director, who knows exactly what he wants, can seldom envisage the final result exactly. All the same Donatas was very good indeed, and I can only be grateful that he played it rather than anyone else; but it was not easy."

51 comments

  • By Angana Chakraborty
    May 24, 2013
    03:41 AM

    Amazing List Provided My God! So Happy.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

  • By kubilay
    May 24, 2013
    04:18 AM

    tarkowski. stalker.... best of the cinema !
    Reply
  • By Tamas Moldovan
    May 24, 2013
    05:30 AM

    I dont think there is a Tarkovsky film that doesnt deserve to be a criterion release. With that being said can you please release some because you really did a phenomenal job with his first three films especially Solaris. It would be cool if yall could rerelease Andrei Rublev with maybe more features and a booklet. But like the people above me said blu-ray is a definite for Tarkovsky cuz his images are so poignant and visually lyrical. However, if you dont wanna release all of them I would suggest Mirror just because people need to get introduced to that one more. Stalker needs no explanation. classic masterpiece. Also Nostaghia would be a remarkable release. Lastly I would leave Sacrifice not because its not great but I feel like Tarkovsky was changing his style to a more austere and less passionate one. This is how it is with all great artists that pass away too soon though. Look at Mozart's last two piano concertos for instance. Not lesser but a genius developing his style.
    Reply
  • By milton
    May 24, 2013
    08:26 AM

    One great meeting of minds overlooked here: Tarkovsky and Brakhage! At the 1983 Telluride Film Festival. Documented most memorably by Brakhage himself (see link below). Too much to resume here (things get juiciest after "La Petite Cinema"), but one can at least quote Brakhage's short speech introducing Tarkovsky: "I personally think that the three greatest tasks for film in the 20th century are (1) To make the epic, that is to tell the tales of the tribes of the world. (2) To keep it personal, because only in the eccentricities of our personal lives do we have any chances at the truth. (3) To do the dream work, that is, to illuminate the borders of the unconscious. The only film maker I know that does all these three things equally in every film he makes is Andrei Tarkovsky, and that's why I think he's the greatest living narrative film maker." http://people.ucalgary.ca/~tstronds/nostalghia.com/TheTopics/Brakhage_and_Tarkovsky.html
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

    • By Callum
      May 27, 2013
      01:58 AM

      So glad you posted this, can't wait to read it, thanks!!
  • By Bill Miner
    May 24, 2013
    11:03 PM

    Stalker Blu Balls Ray.
    Reply
  • By Michael Furman
    May 25, 2013
    04:07 PM

    Milton - thank you for that link. Really fascinating stuff.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

    • By milton
      May 29, 2013
      12:10 AM

      Welcome!
  • By Jamieson
    May 26, 2013
    11:45 AM

    STALKER BLU-RAY PLEASE! One of the greatest films of all time.
    Reply
  • By Callum
    May 27, 2013
    01:57 AM

    10000+ votes from me for Mirror BD, pleeeeeease!!
    Reply
  • By Daniel W.
    May 30, 2013
    05:55 PM

    Every Tarkovsky film needs a criterion blu ray. Especially Andrei Rublev. Criterion needs more Tarkovsky!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

    • By Cameren Lee
      July 25, 2013
      03:31 PM

      Criterion needs ALL Tarkovsky.
  • By Hal Hamilton
    June 02, 2013
    10:32 AM

    A very well crafted assembly which with the comments provide a depth to the various works shown. Some observations are strong enough to compel another viewing. Ones tastes do change. Tarkovsky and Chris Marker and Pontecorvo are for me top of the tree- Criterion ! The only one.
    Reply
  • By PJ Letofsky
    June 02, 2013
    02:36 PM

    I've been making a documentary on Tarkovsky called Time Within Time- based on his diary, and have interviewed a lot of people he worked with; Director Andrei Konchalovsky who went to VGIK Film School and wrote Ivan's Childhood, and Andrei Rublev, Nikolai Burlyaev who acted in both, Natalya Bondarchuk of Solaris, Tonino Guerra who co-wrote Nostalghia, Enrica Antonioni who taught him transcendental meditation, Katinka Farago who was Bergman's production manager for 30 years and managed Sacrifice; I've learned so much of the motivations and behind the scenes dramas of all these films, but don't have enough time in a 90 minute doc to address them all. It's fascinating- please take a look: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1355692020/andrei-tarkovsky-documentary-time-within-time
    Reply
  • By Gord
    June 03, 2013
    12:53 AM

    These over-the-top comments make me sick. The list & quotes are Tarkovsky's. What did this guy do? He may as well have simply given the page numbers and left it at that.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

    • By Grant Douglas Bromley
      June 04, 2013
      10:35 AM

      I'm surprised by the reaction as well. Personally, Tarkovsky's words (and the book that he wrote) are basically holy scripture to me and I'm glad that people seem to adore Tarkovsky's insight as much as I do. If you want the page numbers, I'll give them to you.
    • By Filip Ghiorghi
      August 06, 2013
      07:49 PM

      Educate yourself Gord before you write more foolishness.
  • By Ryan
    July 27, 2013
    10:08 AM

    I agree with others. The DVD of Andrei Rublev is arguably Criterion's very worst in terms of quality. It looks absolutely terrible, especially on a late model large screen TV. The picture jitters everywhere and any areas of high contrast in the frame flash and vibrate. For me, and I own it, it's unwatchable. Criterion must get this film on blu-ray. Stalker too. The sepia scenes, the wet dark interiors, etc. will only really come through on blu-ray.
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

    • By Ryan
      July 27, 2013
      07:09 PM

      ...and Mirror of course.
  • By Pirkka Kukkola
    August 29, 2013
    02:01 PM

    Yes. I am in agreement. It is very much a shame that such an important director, perhaps THE most important, is not represented by Criterion Collection nearly as much as other much lesser directors are, those who are noticeably inferior in every respect to Tarkovsky. Criterion owes it to itself, if it is to be taken seriously, to issue all of Tarkovsky's films on Blue Ray. Anything less is a travesty and a criticism of Criterion and a detraction of its selection process. However difficult as it may be to secure rights to these films it must, nevertheless, be attempted and followed through until ALL of Tarkovsky's films are represented.
    Reply
  • By Peter_Wilson
    October 03, 2013
    11:17 AM

    Great list you got here grant. Please check out mine. http://www.criterion.com/lists/157365-akira-kurosawa-s-favorite-movies http://www.criterion.com/lists/157548-beginning-a-career -- And tell me what you think. -- I was also wondering where I can watch your film, Dreams of the Wayward?
    Reply
    • Or using your Criterion.com account.

      You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.

    • By Grant Douglas Bromley
      October 08, 2013
      09:15 AM

      Thanks, man! Great lists that you assembled as well. As far as my film, Dreams of The Wayward is concerned, it had its festival premiere about 2 weeks ago in Knoxville and we're still looking into more festivals. Eventually a VOD outlet would be nice, but we'll see what happens. Tanks though.
    • By Peter_Wilson
      October 08, 2013
      02:32 PM

      Thanks, for your feedback on my lists, glad to liked them. And I can't wait to see your film.
  • By ZmillA
    November 30, 2013
    07:29 AM

    We need Stalker release on blu ray. What are you people waiting for? Can't you tell us anything about the status of this project? Tell us something! We need Stalker on blu ray. If you have no plans on doing it let someone else!
    Reply
  • By Peter_Wilson
    January 11, 2014
    10:15 AM

    Grant I've got a new list, Your Favorite Criterion Edition, I'm trying to compile members single favorite edition with there comment of the film. I'd be glad if you would participate.
    Reply
  • By nightwalker
    April 14, 2014
    04:06 PM

    Almost everyone wants same thing: Stalker ! This is very great and proving that there are many real Tarkovsky and transcendental cinema lovers in the world. I hope Criterion will response this. Soon, very soon.
    Reply
  • By CINEMATIC
    May 27, 2014
    10:18 AM

    This is a great list !!!! Very informative and interesting. I really hope to see mirror and the rest of his films released on criterion soon. I especially liked what he had to say about Bresson's films .
    Reply
  • By m
    July 12, 2014
    11:33 PM

    WHY isn't Stalker available on blur ay??
    Reply

Or using your Criterion.com account.

You are logged in to your Criterion.com account as . Log out.